- By:
- Franz, Cole; Patterson, Rob; Turcksin, Bruno ; Schmitz, Tony; Page, Katharine
- Journal Name:
- The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology
- Page Number:
- 1405-1419
- Volume:
- 144
- Publication Date:
- June 4, 2026
- View DOI Listing:
- https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-026-17720-7
Abstract
This study presents an analytical model for steady-state power generation and tool heat loss in additive friction-stir deposition (AFSD), developed to enable part-scale thermal simulation while remaining computationally inexpensive. The model predicts total generated power, yielding 3.7–4.7 kW across deposition temperature setpoints of 400–460 °C for the deposition of AA6061 with a Be-Cu tool. This corresponds to 90–95% of the reported spindle power. Tool heat loss is experimentally determined by calibrating a steady-state energy balance between the generated power, the substrate-deposition thermal gradient, and a temperature dependent tool heat loss term: qtool (T) = a + b (T - 400°C) with a = 2.7 x 106Wm-2 and b = 9.5 x 103Wm-2K-1. The calibration indicates that about 69% of the generated heat is conducted into the tool for this configuration, which is much higher than previously reported. The calibrated heat-source is implemented in finite element software (Adamantine) to simulate the transient thermal history of a 100 cm3 representative build in 8 min on a standard desktop (at 0.635 mm build-height resolution). For the first three layers, the substrate temperatures between simulation and experiment are within 10% mean absolute percentage error. Sensitivity analysis indicates that uncertainties in average deposition temperature and deformation localization (stir-zone geometry, depth, and spatial dependance of strain-rate and flow stress) dominate model variance, motivating additional experimental verification.