Cross-Domain Reasoning for Neuromorphic Model Design

Abstract

Designing performant neuromorphic models requires reasoning across neuroscience, neuromorphic computing, and machine learning, making it a natural target for cross-domain hypothesis generation. Our primary contribution is a multi-corpus knowledge graph spanning all three domains, which we show substantially increases cross-domain retrieval novelty over single-corpus baselines. We additionally introduce NeuKReAct, an agentic reasoning framework that iteratively retrieves from this graph and synthesizes design hypotheses via a step-by-step blackboard architecture, enabling structured compartmentalization of design decisions. Lastly, we introduce an execution head that translates hypotheses into structured design documents and runnable code. We evaluate novelty using a combinatorial creativity metric that measures cross-domain retrieval distance across the citation graph. Our results confirm that corpus breadth is the dominant driver of novelty. Moreover, we highlight a concrete instance of the novelty-utility tradeoff within NeuKReAct, underscoring a need for joint creativity evaluation, balancing both novelty and utility.