- By:
- De, Debraj ; Sparks, Kevin A; McBride, Elizabeth C; Burger, Annetta G; Gaboardi, James D; McGaha, Jesse ; Brown, Chance C; Nie, Xiuling ; Thomas, Todd M; Malviya Thakur, Gautam ; Christopher, Steven C
- Page Number:
- 411-418
- Book Title:
- 2026 27th IEEE International Conference on Mobile Data Management (MDM)
- Publication Date:
- September 11, 2026
- Publisher Location:
- IEEE, New Jersey, United States of America
- Conference Name:
- 27th IEEE MDM 2026 Industry Track
- Conference Location:
- Athens, Greece
- Conference Sponsor:
- IEEE
- View DOI Listing:
- https://doi.org/10.1109/MDM71479.2026.00064
Abstract
While much research has been conducted in Human Mobility Science, most studies on the analytics/insights part generally focus on one of the following: processing and analytics on human stop-trip behavior, design of individual mobility metrics (often in silos), calculation and characterization of only a handful (typically 5-6) of human mobility metrics on geospatial-temporal human mobility data of interest. Although human mobility research offers a vast and diverse array of available metrics, most individual studies typically compute only a small subset of five or six metrics at a time when analyzing trajectory datasets of human mobility across different areas of interest. This paper is motivated by the critical need to repeatedly compute an extensive array of human mobility metrics across several trajectory datasets and perform individual metric-level benchmarking to establish a new, standardized Test and Evaluation (T&E) suite for the field of Human Mobility Science. We first present our findings on the minimal yet sufficient pre-processing required to reliably and efficiently compute a wide range of human mobility metrics. The key findings are specifically related to the proposed Composite Stop Locations table, which serves as a core pre-processing data layer. Subsequently, we present a case study demonstrating how the Composite Stop Locations table facilitates computation of at least 14 distinct human mobility metrics (unlike 5-6 different set of metrics used for studies in the literature) using the popular and open-source OpenPFLOW dataset. Finally, we have also presented an example of our benchmarking methodology to evaluate the quality and performance of the trajectory dataset of interest, assessed across multiple human mobility metrics.